Indian Government's National Research Foundation Proposal Draws Mixed Reactions, Reports Pratik Pawar in Science Journal


Esteemed journalist Pratik Pawar, writing in the renowned Science journal, sheds light on the Indian government's recently unveiled proposal for the National Research Foundation (NRF). Pawar reports that the ambitious plan, which aims to invest $6 billion in research over five years, has sparked a range of responses from scientists.

Indian Government's National Research Foundation Proposal Draws Mixed Reactions
More Funding in Research Sector in India Very Soon?

According to Pawar's analysis, while many researchers are optimistic about the creation of an "apex body" dedicated to Indian research, intending to strengthen the nation's relatively limited investments in basic and applied science, there are also concerns among some scientists. The apprehensions revolve around potential political interference and doubts about the feasibility of securing the envisaged funding, particularly the ambitious target of obtaining 70% of the funds from private industry. Pawar quotes Shailja Vaidya Gupta, a former senior science advisor to the government, who regards the funding goal as "a little unrealistic."

The NRF proposal, based on a 2019 report commissioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, aims to address India's lagging research spending compared to other major nations, as well as the quality of research papers and patents produced. The report recommended establishing a robust research agency, akin to the United States' National Science Foundation, to coordinate science policy, consolidate funding, and provide peer-reviewed grants to academic researchers. The proposed annual budget for the NRF was suggested to be 0.1% of India's GDP.

However, Pawar highlights that the current NRF proposal deviates significantly from the original vision. The report stressed the importance of independence, an independent board comprising eminent scientists to select leaders, and "complete autonomy" to ensure unhindered funding for worthy projects. In contrast, the new plan envisions the Prime Minister heading the NRF's board, with government ministers assuming key roles. Pawar quotes Ajay Sood, the government's principal science advisor, who believes that having political leaders involved demonstrates the government's seriousness about the research and development ecosystem.

Nevertheless, Pawar notes the concerns raised by critics who fear potential political meddling due to the association with leaders who have previously endorsed pseudoscientific ideas. The Breakthrough Science Society, an advocacy group, cautions that this alignment could raise apprehensions about the future of scientific research.

In addition, Pawar highlights challenges posed by India's bureaucratic system and the difficulty of securing significant funding from the private sector. Since the NRF will not operate as an independent agency, it will be subject to regulations applicable across various sectors, potentially impeding its efficiency.
Read More :
The government aims to attract over $4 billion from the private sector to fund the NRF between 2023 and 2028, a target some critics view as overly optimistic. The Breakthrough Science Society describes relying on the corporate sector for funding exceeding the government's commitment as a "wild dream."

Pawar concludes by noting that the draft bill outlining the NRF's creation is yet to be publicly released and subjected to debate. Scientists and experts express the importance of transparency and open discussion in shaping the legislation.

With Pratik Pawar's insights published in the esteemed Science journal, it is evident that the Indian government's NRF proposal has sparked both enthusiasm and skepticism within the scientific community, emphasizing the need for a balanced and well-executed approach to enhance India's research landscape.

Post a Comment


Post a Comment (0)

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Check Now
Accept !